Genres | |
Runtime | 1h 56min |
Age | 3+ |
Director | Sydney Pollack |
Rating | 94% 6.9 (13k) |
Overview
1981 saw the release of Absence of Malice, an acclaimed crime drama film directed by Sydney Pollack. Pollack, who had already made his mark with a number of hit films, was no stranger to directing by this point. His direction of Absence of Malice was a masterful blend of intense drama, suspense and dark humor. Whats more, his direction of the cast – including Paul Newman, Melinda Dillon and Wilford Brimley – was nothing short of remarkable. One could almost say that Pollacks direction of Absence of Malice was nothing short of perfection. But is it really fair to call the films direction perfection?
Paul Newman and Sally Field star
Paul Newman and Sally Field star in the 1981 drama Absence of Malice, and they both put in outstanding performances. Have you ever seen two actors work so seamlessly together? From the very start, its clear that these two have an undeniable chemistry. Its almost as if theyre meant to be onscreen together. Its no wonder that these two stars, both of whom have had illustrious Hollywood careers, were so perfectly cast for this film. Its an unforgettable pairing that truly brings the story to life.
Story of a reporter and a man wrongly accused of murder
Have you ever heard the story of a reporter and a man wrongly accused of murder? Its the crux of the 1981 movie Absence of Malice. The movie follows the story of a reporter, Megan Carter, and the man wrongly accused, Michael Gallagher. When Gallagher is accused of murder, Megan Carter is the only one who believes he is innocent. In the end, Carter must find a way to prove his innocence and confront the truth of the case. Despite Gallaghers innocence, he must still face the consequences of being falsely accused. Its a story of tragedy, justice, and a reporters tenacity to do the right thing.
Plot
Megan Carter had been a Miami newspaper reporter for years, but never had she been assigned a story as complex and sensitive as the one she was given that day: the suspicious death of a prominent union leader.
How did he really die? Who was responsible?
These were the questions Carter was determined to answer, and she was going to do it without compromising her journalistic integrity.
All in all, it was a daunting task, but Carter was up for the challenge. After all, it was what she was trained to do.
Michael Gallagher (Newman) is the prime suspect in the case
Michael Gallagher (Newman) is the prime suspect in the case in Absence of Malice (1981). But is he really guilty? Many viewers have their doubts. After all, why would a man of such a good moral standing be involved in something like this? Could he just be an unfortunate victim of circumstance? Its a question that has been asked time and again, and one that may never truly be answered.
What do you think? Is Michael Gallagher guilty or innocent?
Carter begins to investigate Gallagher, unaware that he is innocent
What began as a simple investigation quickly spun out of control for Carter. Unbeknownst to him, the man he was investigating, Gallagher, was actually innocent.
Carter had no idea what he was getting himself into. He thought he was just doing his job, but it soon became clear that something was amiss.
How could an innocent man be accused of a crime he didnt commit? He had to find out.
So Carter started to investigate Gallagher, unaware that he was not the one responsible. Little did he know how his investigation would soon spiral out of control, affecting the lives of everyone involved.
Gallaghers life is ruined as a result of the accusations
What kind of life has been ruined? one might ask. Well, in the movie Absence of Malice, Gallaghers life is destroyed as a result of the accusations.
He loses his job, his reputation is ruined, and hes even evicted from his home. His family is ripped apart, and his relationships with his loved ones are strained beyond repair.
Hes a man who has lost it all, and its all due to the false accusations. In this movie, the consequences of false accusations are brought to life in a very real and heartbreaking way.
He eventually discovers that it was the police who were behind the malicious plot
What did the police have to do with this? he wondered. After all, what would the police gain by setting up an innocent man? As he continued to investigate, he eventually discovered that it was the police who were behind the malicious plot. It became clear that they had used him as a pawn in a game of political chess, manipulating the press and hoping to score a PR win by sacrificing him. But, as the truth came to light, they failed to realize that he was no longer just a piece on the board – he was a person, and he was determined to get justice.
Reception
When Absence of Malice was released in 1981, it was well-received. Critics praised it for its complex and thought-provoking story. Audiences admired its portrayal of broken relationships and the moral dilemmas faced by its characters. The performances of Paul Newman and Sally Field were especially well-received, with the two giving career-best performances. The movie was also praised for its slick direction and sharp dialogue, both of which contribute to its lasting appeal. So, was Absence of Malice well-received upon its release? Absolutely - it was met with critical acclaim and is still remembered fondly today.
Received Academy Award nominations for Best Original Screenplay and Best Actress
Did you know that Absence of Malice (1981) was nominated for two Academy Awards? Best Original Screenplay and Best Actress. Its not surprising, as the movie is a classic, starring Paul Newman and Sally Field. The screenplay was written by Kurt Luedtke, who was nominated for an Oscar for this film. And Sally Field was nominated for her powerful performance as Megan Carter. She brings a vulnerability and vulnerability to the character that makes her story so compelling. Its no wonder they were both nominated for an Academy Award.
Critical praise for its subtle yet powerful performances
Absence of Malice (1981) has been praised for its subtle yet powerful performances. But what is it about these performances that has critics raving? One reviewer says, What makes this film so powerful is that its characters feel so real and alive. Another critic points out, Paul Newmans performance is especially noteworthy, as he conveys a wealth of emotion without saying a word.
Its clear that the performances in this movie are something special. And its no surprise that this film has become a classic.
Acclaim for its complex and timely story
Absence of Malice (1981) has been widely acclaimed for its complex and timely story. But why, exactly, has the film been so successful? It could be because of its deft exploration of the power of the press to shape public opinion and the danger of misconstruing facts. Or, perhaps, its because the story examines the impact of rumour, suspicion, and guilt on a persons life. Whatever the reason, one thing is clear: Absence of Malice is a film that continues to resonate with viewers, decades after its release.
Absence of Malice remains an important and powerful film
Absence of Malice is a powerful and important film that remains relevant to this day. The movie tells the story of a man wrongfully accused of a crime by the media and the public. It raises questions about the power of the press, and how it can be used to manipulate and damage innocent peoples lives. It also speaks to the importance of truth, freedom of the press, and the danger of jumping to conclusions without facts. Its a thought-provoking and timely film that still resonates with audiences today.
Its exploration of truth and justice resonates in today’s world
Absence of Malice (1981) is a powerful exploration of truth and justice and its themes still resonate in today’s world.
How far are we willing to go to uncover the truth? Is the truth always just, or could it lead to injustice?
The film also challenges our preconceived notions of justice, with characters’ actions leading to unexpected consequences.
In a world where truth is often distorted, it’s more important than ever to consider the implications of this exploration of truth and justice. How can we make sure the truth is just and not lead to further injustices?
Absence of Malice (1981) provides an important reminder of the need to carefully consider the consequences of our actions and the implications of our pursuit of truth and justice.
A timeless classic that has stood the test of time.
Absence of Malice (1981) is a timeless classic that has stood the test of time. But why is this movie so special? Is it the powerhouse performances from Paul Newman and Sally Field? Is it the powerful themes of justice, morality and truth? Or is it the masterful direction from director Sydney Pollack? Whatever the reason, this movie has endured for nearly four decades and remains one of the best movies ever made. Its a film that will keep you thinking long after its over.
I enjoyed Absence of Malice because it was an interesting movie about a reporter and a man who was wrongly accused of a crime
I recommend Absence of Malice for anyone looking for a movie that deals with tough issues and has a dramatic ending
I like Absence of Malice movie because it is a powerful and moving drama about innocence, guilt and responsibility
Absence of Malice is unique due to its combination of a legal drama and a romantic drama
Absence of Malice is fantastic movie for the reason that it is an excellent example of how to tell a compelling story